The White Australia Policy

       Fifty years ago, when I lived in Sydney, I frequently visited my godmother in the old suburb of Ashfield. However, when I returned in the 1990s, the suburb had changed. It no longer looked like Australia. The commercial centre was full of east Asians. My godmother's church was offering lessons in English because, apparently, you don't need to be fluent in the national language in order to immigrate. English, at any rate, was optional on the shop windows, where indecipherable languages predominated. The population, I presume, were basically good people with whom I'd make friends if I lived there, but it was like a foreign country. I don't like feeling a stranger in my own country. I want my country back!

      "I'm sorry you have such racist attitudes," an Englishman said when I explained the situation to him.

       As you can see, he was typical of all those who have been pavlovized by the race industry. Ivan Pavlov was the scientist who discovered the conditioned reflex. His dogs used to salivate when he brought meat - as you would expect. Then he began ringing a bell as he brought the meat. Eventually, the dogs would salivate at the sound of the bell, even when no meat appeared. Likewise, a lot of people have been conditioned so that, whenever they hear a reference to race in a negative fashion, their brains automatically hear "racism", which is a bad thing. It short circuits any attempt to get them to think logically.

     And the irony was, because he was even older than me, he should have known better. When I was at school we all heard about the evils of racial segregation in the America south. The meaning of racism, or "racialism" as we called it them, was obvious: it was mistreating people because of their race. Please note that mistreating is the operative word. Now, although Australia might be the best country in the world, I think it's drawing a long bow to suggest not being allowed to settle here is a form of mistreatment. We have moved from the reasonable proposition that people should not be mistreated because of their race, to the questionable one that all distinctions between races are wrong, to the completely ludicrous idea that everyone somehow has a fundamental human right to an equal opportunity to settle in Australia.

      When I pointed this out in a comment on The Guardian, I got the response that the definition of racism has changed. But that's the point. They started with something which everyone knows is wrong, and then subtly inserted positions which are readily defensible.

      I shall throw down this challenge to all you pavlovized people who claim that the White Australia policy was racist: Do you really believe there is some fundamental human right to an equal opportunity to migrate to Australia? If so, you might wish to defend it, because it is not self-evident.

     The White Australia Policy was right and proper. It should never have been discarded. We need to get our country back.

      Now, I can predict a few responses. An avid reader of this blog - assuming that such a creature exists - might well ask: Wasn't I the person who said that I always treasure the friendships I once had of people from Asia, Africa, and the Pacific Islands? Of course! And I also campaigned on behalf of Cambodian refugees. Even now, I tend an Indian doctor and a Chinese dentist, and I am a fan of Dami Im. As Henry Lawson pointed out, you can support White Australia and still be friends with individual non-whites. I get along well with foreigners. I take an interest in them. They make the place more interesting. But it is a different matter when they become so numerous that they change the nature of the country. A culinary comparison is appropriate: a sprinkling of salt, spices, or condiments improve the flavour of the food, but a large amount destroys the meal.

       Another red herring: I have often heard Fatima Payman, the Afghan born Senator who left the Labor Party because it was not sufficiently antisemitic, described as being "brown". Rubbish! Ms Payman, like other Afghans, is white! If she took off that silly head scarf and dressed normally, she would pass unnoticed in the street. The populations west of Pakistan, all the way to Morocco, are caucasian. They may have olive skin and brown eyes, but so do most of population of southern Europe.  It is their religion and culture which make them incompatible with Australia. Nevertheless, when the fathers of Federation introduced the White Australia Policy, they were thinking of Europeans, so let us leave it at that.

      Now, we might turn the issue around and ask: what if you wanted to migrate to an Asian country? Well, most of the time, you couldn't.  My cousin's son works as a teacher in Japan. He loves it. He keeps getting his visa renewed. But eventually he will have to leave - taking his superannuation rights with him, for the Japanese are fair. Japan does not like immigration, even though their native population is declining. Short of marrying a Japanese, it is almost impossible for an outsider to gain Japanese citizenship. In the 1960s we were told that the White Australia Policy would make us unpopular with the newly independent Asian nations, but apparently Japan doesn't worry about being unpopular. Admittedly, Japan has one of the strictest immigration policies in the world, but every one of our neighbours has much stricter policies than Australia. The concept of an ethnostate is the default throughout the world - except for the establishment in white countries, to whom the very idea of a country set aside for Europeans is anathema.

      In 1984 one of our most respected historians, Geoffrey Blainey made a speech in which he pointed out that bringing in large numbers of immigrants at a time of high unemployment, and ensuring that 40 per cent of them came from Asia, with a bias against British immigrants, was not a very sensible way to achieve social cohesion. That set the cat among the pigeons! Public opinion polls have consistently shown majority support for this view, but it was too much for the left wing establishment, which went into what was to become its usual modus operandi of vilification. They labeled him a racist.

      This inspired the then Deputy Prime Minister, Bill Hayden to make the following statement:

Australia is changing. We're an anomaly as a European country in this part of the world. There's already a large and growing Asian population in Australia and it is inevitable in my view that Australia will become a Eurasian country over the next century or two. Australian Asians and Europeans will marry one another and a new race will emerge: I happen to think that's desirable.

     Coming from such a source, it is hard to believe this was not government policy. They wanted to change our ethnic identity. All right, it was 42 years ago, but can anyone doubt that this is what has been happening over the last 42 years? Anyhow, there is one way to find out: the Prime Minister should be asked if this is still Labor policy. He shouldn't be allowed to beat around the bush; the question invites a simple yes or no answer.

      For that matter, the Leader of the Opposition should also be asked if this is Coalition policy. Let him squirm, for these politicians are invertebrates; they have no backbone. John Howard spoke out in agreement with Blainey at the time, but when he became Leader of the Opposition, he was forced to recant. They were afraid of losing the vote - if they ever had it - of the Asian populations. It just shows that bad social policy must be nipped in the bud, before it acquires a large group with vested interests in it. In 1996 a Liberal candidate in what was considered an unwinnable seat, Pauline Hanson spoke out against Asian migration. Her party went into panic mode; they disendorsed her. They were terrified of being called racists. And that is how One Nation began - because Pauline won that seat despite everything.

     So what is the situation now? Of course, Hayden's dream of creating a new race, even if it were legitimate, contains a fatal flaw. When migrants arrive in dribs and drabs, they have no real option but to assimilate. However, when they come in large numbers, and especially if their race and customs are grossly different to the host country's, they cluster into enclaves and avoid mixing. In Melbourne their exists a food delivery business which operates wholly in the Chinese language. Recently the Strathfield council caught flak by insisting that all shop signs contain English. This, of course, affects more than just the native population, for the Indians can't read Chinese, and the Chinese can't read Hindi. What does it say about a society where immigrant ghettoes choose deliberately to interact only with their own kind?

     And what does it say about the event in 2023, when residents attended a meeting called by a councillor in a Sydney suburb concerning a controversial proposed rubbish tip? They were dismayed to discover that the meeting was held completely in Mandarin, without any English translation.

      A quarter of a century ago Pauline Hanson predicted that, by 2025, twenty percent of the Australian population would be Asian. This turned out to be spot on, if you include east Asia, the Indian subcontinent, and the Middle East. In 2011 Chris Bowen, the Minister for Immigration boasted - yes, boasted! - that for the first time we had taken more Chinese than British immigrants. In 2018/19 migrants from Nepal outnumbered those from the United Kingdom. Did you vote for any of this? The proportion of British and European immigrants fell from 21% in 2004 to 5% in 2019, while 85% were from Asia, the Middle East, and Africa. Did you vote for this? The period 2011 to 2016 brought us a net migration of 854,870, out of which 504,010 came from Third World countries, and only 660 were from the British Isles and Europe.

      Not only are the percentages significant, but the absolute numbers are increasing. During the current Albanese Government, net immigration has averaged 424,000. Not only that, but the Government has only this year proclaimed that they are aiming for a population of 39 million in 40 years' time. Furthermore, in at least two states 40% of newborn babies are from foreign born mothers, the largest number from India and China, while births by Australian born women are down 10%.

     Needless to say, the same is going on throughout the western world. The United Kingdom, although an overcrowded island, has been swept up in such a huge influx of migrants that its indigenous population (the "white British") are now marginally a minority in London, and represent only five sixths of the total population. Worse, their children are only two thirds of those in school. A great nation is being destroyed.

     If you look up the Great Replacement, you will discover that all left wing sources call it a "conspiracy theory". Apparently, they think that merely labelling it as such will debunk it. But let's not talk about conspiracies as such, and just look at the facts. As far as Australia goes:

• Our birth rate is well below replacement level.
• It is being more than made up for with immigration, such that the country is growing rapidly.
• But the immigrants are not our own people; they are overwhelmingly of alien races and cultures.
• Conclusion: we are being replaced. 

     Why? I do not believe it is impossible to acquire the right number of immigrants from Europe. This is intentional. I can think of three main reasons.

1. Many of our leaders have been thoroughly pavlovized. They really do think that a White Australia policy would be racist. Even those who don't are moral cowards; they are terrified of being called racists.
2. Many of them actually hate their country and its culture. They want to change it. Bill Hayden's statement that creating a Eurasian race would be a good thing is just a lesser example of this. Again, the sickness runs deep throughout the western world. You won't need to read much of the news from Europe to see comments from the leftwing elite that their own cultures are non-existent or bad, and need to be replaced.
3. They are importing voters. Jacinta Price caught flak by saying that the Government is bringing in Indian migrants so that they will vote Labor - which everyone knows to be true. To quote Jordan Knight in 2023:

'When these [immigrants] enroll to vote, 20 per cent more of them will vote Labor, boasted a Labor-aligned consultant, showing a chart of Labor’s exploding migrant arrival numbers. Labor’s numbers stack up. According to research done by the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, newly arrived migrants are more than twice as likely to vote Labor as they are the Coalition (45 to 23 per cent). Their plan so far is working. In NSW, out of the top areas for foreign-born population, 16 out of 20 voted Labor. 

         You would think, wouldn't you, that the Coalition, whenever it gets into power, would put an end to this process out of sheer self-interest, but they never do. They are terrified of being called racists, and of losing the votes of those who don't vote for them anyway.

        Of course, this has been a familiar story throughout the western world. The Blair Labour Government deliberately threw open the doors of the UK to mass migration in order to produce multiculturalism. In the United States the Democrats openly boast of changing the demography of the country in order to replace Republican voters. Yes, the same people who call the Great Replacement a conspiracy theory admit the conspiracy when they talk about it to themselves.

       What is to be done about it? This is a problem throughout the western world, where the elites believe that a falling birth rate can be fixed by replacing the population. Ultimately, they are going to have to accept the Japanese position that a smaller country is preferable to a different country. But for a small country like Australia the solution is much simpler. We must reduce immigration to the level where it just makes up for the failure of the native birth rate and keeps the population steady. And we should make sure that these immigrants are overwhelmingly white, and preferably British. We can also find something better to do with the $326 million now being given to multicultural groups in order to divide us into tribes.

      Considering the current popular demand for a reduction in immigration, the first part of the plan is feasible. But the second part will require intense pressure and unrelenting campaigning, because there are strong elite forces determined the thwart us and change the country forever.

     As for me, I am seventy-seven years old. But what about you - and your children and grandchildren? We are in the process of losing our country. The hour is very late.

     So do not be hesitant or ashamed to openly campaign for a White Australia. And if people call you a racist, you have two options.

    1. Ignore the peasants! An insult is not an argument, and your self-esteem does not depend on the opinion of some ignorant unAustralian bigot.

    2. However, if you think they might be open to logic, or you wish to convince a third party, ask these questions: What is your definition of "racist", and why do you think it is always wrong? Do you really believe that everyone somehow has a fundamental human right to an equal opportunity to settle in Australia? If so, they might like to justify it, for it is not self-evident.